4.3 Article

Relationship of glycaemic index with cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey for people aged 65 and older

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 1321-1335

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980007702914

关键词

glycaemic index; dietary fibre; elderly; weight; cardiovascular risk factors; cross-sectional survey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To identify associations between dietary glycaemic index (GO and weight, body mass index and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) - waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), lipoprotein fractions, triacylglycerols (TAG) and blood pressure (BP) - in an older British population. Design: Cross-sectional dietary, anthropometric and biochemical data front the National Diet and Nutritional Survey for adults aged over 65 years were reanalysed using a hierarchical regression model. Associations between body weight, CVD risk factors, and dietary factors including GI and fibre intakes were explored among 1152 healthy older people living in the UK between 1994 and 1995. Results: In the unadjusted model, GI was significantly and directly associated with TAG (beta = 0.008 +/- 0.003) and diastolic BP (beta = 0.325 +/- 0.164) in males. These relationships were attenuated and non-significant after adjustment for potential confounding factors. WHR (beta = 0.003 +/- 0.001) and TAG (beta = 0.005 +/- 0.002) were significantly predicted by GI in males and females combined. The association with WHR was attenuated by adjustment for sex, age, region and social class; the relationship with TAG was non-significant after adjustment for other potential dietary confounders. Conclusion: After controlling for potential confounders, no clear links were detected between GI and body weight or other CVD risk factors. This study provides little evidence for advising the consumption of a low-GI diet in the elderly to prevent weight gain or improve other CVD risk factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据