3.9 Article

Breath-hold time during cold water immersion: Effects of habituation with psychological training

期刊

AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 78, 期 11, 页码 1029-1034

出版社

AEROSPACE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.2100.2007

关键词

drowning; head-out immersion; psychological training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The loss of the conscious control of respiration on whole body cold water immersion (CWI) can result in the aspiration of water and drowning. Repeated CWl reduces the respiratory drive evoked by CWI and should prolong breath-hold time on CWl (BHmax(cwl)). Psychological skills training (PST) can also increase BHmax(cwl) by improving the ability of individuals to consciously suppress the drive to breathe. This study tested the hypothesis that combining PST and repeated CWl would extend BHmax(cwl) beyond that seen following only repeated CWl. Methods: There were 20 male subjects who completed two 2.5-min, head-out breath-hold CWI (BH1 and BH2) in water at 12 degrees C. Following BH1, subjects were matched on BHmax(cwl) and allocated to a habituation (HAB) group or a habituation plus PST group (H+PST). Between BH1 and BH2 both experimental groups undertook five 2.5-min CW1 on separate days, during which they breathed freely. The H+PST also received psychological training to help tolerate cold and suppress the drive to breathe on immersion to extend BHmax(cwl). Results: During BH1, mean BHmax(cwl) (+/- SD) in the HAB group was 22.00 (10.33) s and 22.38 (10.65) s in the H+PST. After the five free-breathing CWl, both groups had a longer BHmax(cwl) in BH2. The HAB group improved by 14.13 (20.21) s, an increase of 73%. H+PST improved by 26.86 (24.70) s, a 120% increase. No significant differences were identified between the groups. Conclusion: Habituation significantly increases BHmax on CWl, the addition of PST did not result in statistically significant improvements in BHmax(cwl,) but may have practical significance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据