4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Doubly radiolabeled liposomes for pretargeted radioimmunotherapy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 344, 期 1-2, 页码 110-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.05.024

关键词

liposomes; radiolabeling; Bolton-Hunter; pharmacokinetics; biodistribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to design liposomes as radioactivity carriers for pretargeted radioimmunotherapy with favorable pharmacokinetic parameters. To monitor the liposomes integrity in vivo, their surface was radiolabeled with indium-111 bound to DTPA-derivatized phosphatidylethanolamine (DSPE-DTPA) and the aqueous phase was labeled by using an original active loading technique of radioiodinated Bolton-Hunter reagent (BH) that reacts with pre-encapsulated arginine to form a positively charged conjugate (I-125-BH-arginine). Different formulations of doubly radiolabeled liposomes were tested in vitro and in vivo to evaluate radiolabeling stability, integrity of the vesicles and their pharmacokinetics. Radiolabeling yields were high (surface >75%, encapsulation >60%) and stable (>85% after 24h in serum 37 degrees C). In vivo, the pharmacokinetic behavior of doubly radiolabeled liposomes was strongly dependant on the formulation. Blood clearance of PEGylated liposomes (DSPC/Chol/DSPE-DTPA/DSPE-PEG5%) was 0.15mL/h compared to a conventional formulation (DSPC/Chol/DSPE-DTPA: clearance 1.44 mL/h). Non-encapsulated BH-arginine conjugate was quickly eliminated in urine (clearance 6.04 mL/h). Blood kinetics of the two radionuclides were similar and radiochromatographic profiles of mice serum confirmed the integrity of circulating liposomes. The significant reduction of activity uptake in organs after liposome catabolism (liver and spleen), achieved by the rapid renal elimination of I-125-BH-arginine, should bring significant improvements for targeted radionuclide therapy with sterically-stabilized liposomes. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据