4.2 Article

Efficient approximation of convex recolorings

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES
卷 73, 期 7, 页码 1078-1089

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2007.03.006

关键词

convex recoloring; approximation algorithms; phylogenetic trees; local ratio technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A coloring of a tree is convex if the vertices that pertain to any color induce a connected subtree; a partial coloring (which assigns colors to some of the vertices) is convex if it can be completed to a convex (total) coloring. Convex coloring of trees arises in areas such as phylogenetics, linguistics, etc., e.g., a perfect phylogenetic tree is one in which the states of each character induce a convex coloring of the tree. Research on perfect phylogeny is usually focused on finding a tree so that few predetermined partial colorings of its vertices are convex. When a coloring of a tree is not convex, it is desirable to know '' how far '' it is from a convex one. In [S. Moran, S. Snir, Convex recoloring of strings and trees: Definitions, hardness results and algorithms, in: WADS, 2005, pp. 218-232; J. Comput. System Sci., submitted for publication], a natural measure for this distance, called the recoloring distance was defined: the minimal number of color changes at the vertices needed to make the coloring convex. This can be viewed as minimizing the number of '' exceptional vertices '' w.rt. a closest convex coloring. The problem was proved to be NP-hard even for colored strings. In this paper we continue the work of [S. Moran, S. Snir, Convex recoloring of strings and trees: Definitions, hardness results and algorithms, in: WADS, 2005, pp. 218-232; J. Comput. System Sci., submitted for publication], and present a 2-approximation algorithm of convex recoloring of strings whose running time O(cn), where c is the number of colors and n is the size of the input, and an 0 (cn 2) 3-approximation algorithm for convex recoloring of trees. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据