4.7 Article

piggyBac transposon mediated transgenesis of the human blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 13, 页码 3479-3489

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.07-8726com

关键词

schistosome; gene manipulation; electroporation; parasitic helminth; functional genomics; reverse genetics

资金

  1. PHS HHS [N0155270] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transposon piggyBac from the genome of the cabbage looper moth Trichoplusia ni has been observed in the laboratory to jump into the genomes of key model and pathogenic eukaryote organisms including mosquitoes, planarians, human and other mammalian cells, and the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Introduction of exogenous transposons into schistosomes has not been reported but transposon-mediated transgenesis of schistosomes might supersede current methods for functional genomics of this important human pathogen. In the present study we examined whether the piggyBac transposon could deliver reporter transgenes into the genome of Schistosoma mansoni parasites. A piggyBac donor plasmid modified to encode firefly luciferase under control of schistosome gene promoters was introduced along with 7-methylguanosine capped RNAs encoding piggyBac transposase into cultured schistosomula by square wave electroporation. The activity of the helper transposase mRNA was confirmed by Southern hybridization analysis of genomic DNA from the transformed schistosomes, and hybridization signals indicated that the piggyBac transposon had integrated into numerous sites within the parasite chromosomes. piggyBac integrations were recovered by retrotransposon-anchored PCR, revealing characteristic piggyBac TTAA footprints in the vicinity of the endogenous schistosome retrotransposons Boudicca, SR1, and SR2. This is the first report of chromosomal integration of a transgene and somatic transgenesis of this important human pathogen, in this instance accomplished by mobilization of the piggyBac transposon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据