4.7 Article

Chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stem cells in transwell cultures: Generation of Scaffold-free cartilage

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 2786-2796

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0374

关键词

mesenchymal stem cells; chondrogenesis; extracellular matrix; gene expression

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human bone marrow stem cells (hNMCs) have been shown to differentiate in vitro into a number of cell lineages and are a potential autologous cell source for the repair and replacement of damaged and diseased musculoskeletal tissues. hMSC differentiation into chondrocytes has been described in high-density cell pellets cultured with specific growth and differentiation factors. We now describe how culture of hMSCs as a shallow multicellular layer on a permeable membrane over 2-4 weeks resulted in a much more efficient formation of cartilaginous tissue than in established chondrogenic assays. In this format, the hMSCs differentiated in 14 days to produce translucent, flexible discs, 6 mm in diameter by 0.8-1 mm in thickness from 0.5 X 10(6) cells. The discs contained an extensive cartilage-like extracellular matrix (ECM), with more than 50% greater proteoglycan content per cell than control hMSCs differentiated in standard cell pellet cultures. The disc constructs were also enriched in the cartilage-specific collagen H, and this was more homogeneously distributed than in cell pellet cultures. The expression of cartilage matrix genes for collagen type 11 and aggrecan was enhanced in disc cultures, but improved matrix production was not accompanied by increased expression of the transcription factors SOX9, L-SOX5, and SOX6. The fast continuous growth of cartilage ECM in these cultures up to 4 weeks appeared to result from the geometry of the construct and the efficient delivery of nutrients to the cells. Scaffold-free growth of cartilage in this format will provide a valuable experimental system for both experimental and potential clinical studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据