4.7 Article

Prostate-specific antigen doubling time before onset of chemotherapy as a predictor of survival for hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 1828-1833

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm332

关键词

chemotherapy; hormone-refractory prostate cancer; overall survival; predictive factor; prostate-specific antigen doubling time

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We evaluated the possible use of prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSA-DT) before chemotherapy initiation as a surrogate marker of survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Patients and methods: Data from 250 consecutive metastatic HRPC patients treated with chemotherapy between February 2000 and November 2006 were retrospectively analysed. At least three PSA assays were required within 3 months before chemotherapy. PSA-DT was calculated as In 2 divided by the slope of the log PSA line, and the difference between two log PSA levels was divided by the time interval. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Survival rates according to PSA-DT were stratified on chemotherapy regimen. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to isolate the impact of PSA-DT on OS, controlling for associate prognostic covariates. Results: Patients received clocetaxel-(82%) or mitoxantrone-based chemotherapy. The median PSA-DT was 45 days (range 4.7-1108 days). There were 174 deaths (70%). The median survival was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval [Cl] = 12.5-20.5) and 26.4 months (95% Cl = 20.3-32.4) for patients with a PSA-DT < 45 and >= 45 days, respectively. In the multivariate setting, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.39 (95% Cl = 1.03-1.89; P = 0.04), stratified by chemotherapy regimen. Conclusion: A short PSA-DT before onset of chemotherapy in HRPC patients was associated with an increased risk of death. This could be useful as a stratification parameter in trials with new drugs in a metastatic setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据