4.4 Article

Neutral Biogeography and the Evolution of Climatic Niches

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 183, 期 5, 页码 573-584

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/675506

关键词

punctuated equilibrium; comparative analysis; neutral biodiversity theory; phylogenetic niche conservatism; Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Community [281422]
  2. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  3. Rhone-Alpes region [CPER07_13 CIRA]
  4. project EVORANGE [ANR-09-PEXT-011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent debate on whether climatic niches are conserved through time has focused on how phylogenetic niche conservatism can be measured by deviations from a Brownian motion model of evolutionary change. However, there has been no evaluation of this methodological approach. In particular, the fact that climatic niches are usually obtained from distribution data and are thus heavily influenced by biogeographic factors has largely been overlooked. Our main objective here was to test whether patterns of climatic niche evolution that are frequently observed might arise from neutral dynamics rather than from adaptive scenarios. We developed a model inspired by neutral biodiversity theory, where individuals disperse, compete, and undergo speciation independently of climate. We then sampled the climatic niches of species according to their geographic position and showed that even when species evolve independently of climate, their niches can nonetheless exhibit evolutionary patterns strongly differing from Brownian motion. Indeed, climatic niche evolution is better captured by a model of punctuated evolution with constraints due to landscape boundaries, two features that are traditionally interpreted as evidence for selective processes acting on the niche. We therefore suggest that deviation from Brownian motion alone should not be used as evidence for phylogenetic niche conservatism but that information on phenotypic traits directly linked to physiology is required to demonstrate that climatic niches have been conserved through time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据