4.4 Article

Assortative Mating and the Maintenance of Population Structure in a Natural Hybrid Zone

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 184, 期 2, 页码 225-232

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/677033

关键词

introgression; mate choice; reproductive isolation; Xiphophorus; Poeciliidae

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) DDIG [IOS-1011613]
  2. NSF [IOS-0923825, IGERT-0654377]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia Mexico-Clave [0127310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the factors that give rise to natural hybrid zones and govern their dynamics and structure is important to predicting the evolutionary consequences of hybridization. Here we use a combination of multigenerational population genetic data, mating patterns from a natural population, behavioral assays, and mark recapture data within clinal hybrid zones of the genus Xiphophorus to test the role of assortative mating in maintaining population structure and the potential for ongoing genetic exchange between heterospecifics. Our data demonstrate that population structure is temporally robust and driven largely by assortative mating stemming from precopulatory isolation between pure species. Furthermore, mark-recapture data revealed that rates of migration within the same stream reach are far below the level needed to support population structure. In contrast to many empirical studies of natural hybrid zones, there appeared to be no hybrid male dysfunction or discrimination against hybrid males by pure parental females, and hybrid females mated and associated with pure species and hybrid males at random. Despite strong isolation between pure parentals, hybrids therefore can act as a conduit for genetic exchange between heterospecifics, which has been shown to increase the tempo of evolutionary change. Additionally, our findings highlight the complexity of natural hybrid zone dynamics, demonstrating that sexual and ecological selection together can give rise to patterns that do not fit classical models of hybrid zone evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据