4.4 Article

Ghosts of Habitats Past: Environmental Carry-Over Effects Drive Population Dynamics in Novel Habitat

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 181, 期 5, 页码 596-608

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/670127

关键词

habitat quality; metapopulation; carry-over effects; population dynamics; cannibalism; phenotypic plasticity

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0841686]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0841686] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1256860] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phenotype of adults can be strongly influenced by the environmental conditions experienced during development. Consequently, variation in habitat quality across space and through time also leads to differences in the phenotypes of adults. This could create carry-over effects where differences in the natal habitat quality of colonizers influence population dynamics in new habitats. We tested this hypothesis experimentally by simulating dispersal of Tribolium castaneum from low-or high-quality natal habitat into new patches of low-or high-quality habitat. Differences in the natal habitat quality of colonizers altered population growth trajectories and led to carrying capacities that differed by up to 63% within a habitat type, indicating that patch dynamics are determined by the interaction of past and current habitat quality. Interestingly, even after multiple generations, the natal habitat of colonizers determined differences in adult traits that were related to density-dependent population regulation. These changes in adult phenotype could at least partially explain why carry-over effects continued to alter population dynamics for multiple generations until the end of the experiment. These results highlight the importance of variable habitat quality and carry-over effects for population dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据