4.7 Article

Fluorescent and affinity-based tools to detect cysteine sulfenic acid formation in proteins

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 2004-2017

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bc700257a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R21 CA112145, R21 CA112145-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [1 S10 RR017846, S10 RR017846] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM075304-03, R01 GM075304] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cysteine sulfenic acid formation in proteins results from the oxidative modification of susceptible cysteine residues by hydrogen peroxide, alkyl hydroperoxides, and peroxynitrite. This species represents a biologically significant modification occurring during oxidant signaling or oxidative stress, and it can modulate protein function. Most methods to identify, such oxidatively modified proteins rely on monitoring the loss of one or more thiol group(s) or on selective labeling of nascent thiol groups following reduction of oxidized proteins. Our previous work reported the direct labeling of these chemically distinct modifications with a dimedone analogue, 1,3-cyclohexadione, to which a linker and functional group (an alcohol) had been added; further addition of a fluorescent isatoic acid or methoxycoumarin reporter allowed detection of the incorporated tag by fluorescence techniques (Poole, L. B., Zeng, B. B., Knaggs, S. A., Yakubu, M., and King, S. B. (2005) Synthesis of chemical probes to map sulfenic acid modifications on proteins. Bioconjugate Chem. 16, 1624-1628). We have now expanded our arsenal of tagging reagents to include two fluorescein-, two rhodamine-, and three biotin-conjugated probes based on the original approach. The new tools provide readily detectable fluorescent and affinity probes to identify sulfenic acid modifications in proteins and have been used in subsequent mass spectrometric analyses to confirm covalent attachment of the conjugates and directly determine the site of modification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据