4.4 Article

Phenotypic Selection Favors Missing Trait Combinations in Coexisting Annual Plants

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 182, 期 2, 页码 191-207

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/671058

关键词

trade-offs; phenotypic selection analysis; Sonoran Desert; winter annual plants; relative growth rate; water-use efficiency

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0924658]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0817121, 0844780] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trade-offs among traits are important for maintaining biodiversity, but the role of natural selection in their construction is not often known. It is possible that trade-offs reflect fundamental constraints, negative correlational selection, or directional selection operating on costly, redundant traits. In a Sonoran Desert community of winter annual plants, we have identified a trade-off between relative growth rate and water-use efficiency among species, such that species with high relative growth rate have low water-use efficiency and vice versa. We measured selection on water-use efficiency, relative growth rate, and underlying traits within populations of four species at two study sites with different average climates. Phenotypic trait correlations within species did not match the among-species trade-off. In fact, for two species with high water-use efficiency, individuals with high relative growth rate also had high water-use efficiency. All populations experienced positive directional selection for water-use efficiency and relative growth rate. Selection tended to be stronger on water-use efficiency at the warmer and drier site, and selection on relative growth rate tended to be stronger at the cooler and wetter site. Our results indicate that directional natural selection favors a phenotype not observed among species in the community, suggesting that the among-species trade-off could be due to pervasive genetic constraints, perhaps acting in concert with processes of community assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据