4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Brain metabolism of nutritionally essential polyunsaturated fatty acids depends on both the diet and the liver

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plefa.2007.10.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 AG999999] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma alpha-linolenic acid (alpha-LNA, 18:3n-3) and linoleic acid (LA, 18:2n-6) do not contribute significantly to the brain content of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) or arachidonic acid (AA, 20:4n-6), respectively, and neither DHA nor AA can be synthesized de novo in vertebrate tissue. Therefore, measured rates of incorporation of circulating DHA and AA into brain exactly represent their rates of consumption by brain. Positron emission tomography (PET) has been used to show, based on this information, that the adult human brain consumes AA and DHA at rates of 17.8 and 4.6 mg/day, respectively, and that AA consumption does not change significantly with age. In unanesthetized adult rats fed an n-3 PUFA adequate diet containing 4.6% alpha-LNA (of total fatty acids) as its only n-3 PUFA, the rate of liver synthesis of DHA was more than sufficient to maintain brain DHA, whereas the brain's rate of DHA synthesis is very low and unable to do so. Reducing dietary alpha-LNA in the DHA-free diet led to upregulation of liver but not brain coefficients of alpha-LNA conversion to DHA and of liver expression of elongases and desaturases that catalyze this conversion. Concurrently, brain DHA loss slowed due to downregulation of several of its DHA-metabolizing enzymes. Dietary alpha-LNA deficiency also promoted accumulation of brain docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n-6), and upregulated expression of AA-metabolizing enzymes, including cytosolic and secretory phospholipases A(2) and cyclooxygenase-2. These changes, plus reduced levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) in n-3 PUFA diet deficient rats, likely render their brain more vulnerable to neuropathological insults. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据