4.4 Article

Biophysical Aspects of Resource Acquisition and Competition in Algal Mixotrophs

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 178, 期 1, 页码 98-112

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/660284

关键词

mixotroph; plankton; diffusion; resource acquisition; resource competition; mechanistic

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1029900] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [0806229] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixotrophic organisms combine autotrophic and heterotrophic nutrition and are abundant in both freshwater and marine environments. Recent observations indicate that mixotrophs constitute a large fraction of the biomass, bacterivory, and primary production in oligotrophic environments. While mixotrophy allows greater flexibility in terms of resource acquisition, any advantage must be traded off against an associated increase in metabolic costs, which appear to make mixotrophs uncompetitive relative to obligate autotrophs and heterotrophs. Using an idealized model of cell physiology and community competition, we identify one mechanism by which mixotrophs can effectively outcompete specialists for nutrient elements. At low resource concentrations, when the uptake of nutrients is limited by diffusion toward the cell, the investment in cell membrane transporters can be minimized. In this situation, mixotrophs can acquire limiting elements in both organic and inorganic forms, outcompeting their specialist competitors that can utilize only one of these forms. This advantage can be enough to offset as much as a twofold increase in additional metabolic costs incurred by mixotrophs. This mechanism is particularly relevant for the maintenance of mixotrophic populations and productivity in the highly oligotrophic subtropical oceans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据