4.4 Article

Senescence of Maternal Effects: Aging Influences Egg Quality and Rearing Capacities of a Long-Lived Bird

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 175, 期 4, 页码 469-480

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/650726

关键词

senescence; Sula nebouxii; maternal effects; age-dependent maternal investment

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico [IN211406, IN228309]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) [47599, 81823]
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [CGL2006-10357-C02-01/BOS]
  4. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia
  5. Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Biomedicas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Senescence could depress prenatal and postnatal capacities of mothers to invest in offspring. Longitudinal observations on the blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii) revealed a quadratic effect of female age on fledgling production and cohort differences in rate of reproductive decline. By swapping clutches between females of different ages, we tested whether reproductive senescence is due to decline in egg quality or capacity to care. As laying mothers aged, egg size, ulna length of 5-day-old chicks, and ulna growth of second chicks up to age 30 days declined, and as rearing mothers aged, ulna growth and cellular mediated immune response of second chicks diminished. Oddly, senescent females (>11 years) produced more fledglings when rearing offspring of middle-aged females (8-11 years) than when rearing offspring of senescent or young females. Thus, senescence reduced egg quality and rearing capacities, and reproductive success of senescent mothers depended on prenatal effects associated with the age of the laying mother. Reproductive senescence of boobies may involve constraints on resources allocated to reproduction as well as adaptive adjustment of provision and care according to offspring value, implying that negative effects of senescence on offspring survival can be ameliorated by plasticity in postlaying or postnatal care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据