4.7 Article

Multidecadal climate variability and climate interactions affect subalpine fire occurrence, Western Colorado (USA)

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 88, 期 11, 页码 2891-2902

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/06-1860.1

关键词

AMO; climate; ENSO; fire ecology; multidecadal; PDO; rocky mountains; subalpine forests

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the in. fluence of climatic variability on subalpine forest. re occurrence in western Colorado during the AD 1600 - 2003 period. Interannual and multidecadal relationships between fire occurrence and the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) were examined, in addition to the effects of phase interactions among these oscillations. Fires occurred during short-term periods of significant drought and extreme cool (negative) phases of ENSO and PDO and during positive departures from mean AMO index. At longer time scales, fires exhibited 20-year periods of synchrony with the cool phase of the PDO, and 80-year periods of synchrony with extreme warm (positive) phases of the AMO. Years of combined positive AMO and negative ENSO and PDO phases represent triple whammies'' that significantly increased the occurrence of drought-induced fires. Fires were synchronous with this phase combination over 0-30 year periods and distinctly asynchronous with the opposite phase combination. Overall, because fires are synchronous at supra-annual to multidecadal time scales with warm AMO events, particularly when combined with cool ENSO and PDO phases, this suggests that we may be entering a qualitatively different. re regime in the next few decades due to the recent shift in 1998 to a likely long-term warm AMO phase. Although uncertainty remains regarding the effects of CO2-induced warming at regional scales, given the multidecadal persistence of the AMO there is mounting evidence that the recent shift to the positive phase of the AMO will promote higher. re frequencies in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据