4.6 Article

Interactions of a light hypersonic jet with a nonuniform interstellar medium

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
卷 173, 期 1, 页码 37-69

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/520640

关键词

radio continuum : galaxies; turbulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present three-dimensional simulations of the interaction of a light hypersonic jet with an inhomogeneous thermal and turbulently supported disk in an elliptical galaxy. These simulations are applicable to the GPS/CSS phase of extragalactic radio sources. The interstellar medium in these simulations consists of a conventional hot ( T similar to 10(7) K) component together with a warm ( T similar to 10(4) K) turbulently supported disk whose local density is described by a lognormal density distribution and whose spatial structure is realized from a fractal power law. We model the jet as a light, supersonic nonrelativistic flow with parameters selected to be consistent with a relativistic jet with kinetic power just above the FR1/FR2 break. We identify four generic phases in the evolution of such a jet with the inhomogeneous interstellar medium: ( 1) an initial flood and channel'' phase, where progress is characterized by high-pressure gas finding changing weak points in the ISM, flowing through channels that form and reform over time; ( 2) a spherical, energy-driven bubble phase, where the bubble is larger than the disk scale, but the jet remains fully disrupted close to the nucleus; ( 3) a subsequent, rapid, jet break-out phase where the jet breaks free of the last obstructing dense clouds, becomes collimated once more, and pierces the spherical bubble; and ( 4) a classical phase, where the jet propagates in a momentum-dominated fashion similar to jets in single-component hot halos, leading to the classical jet-Y cocoon-bow shock structure. Mass transport in the simulations is investigated, and we propose a model for the morphology and component proper motions in the well-studied compact symmetric object 4C 31.04.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据