4.6 Article

Targeting the Wilms tumor antigen 1 by TCR gene transfer:: TCR variants improve tetramer binding but not the function of gene modified human T cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 9, 页码 5803-5810

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.9.5803

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0700149] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously described the functional activity of a human TCR specific for an HLA-A2-presented peptide derived from the Wilms tumor Ag 1 (WT1). Recent studies showed that the expression and function of human TCR was improved by the introduction of an additional disulfide bond between the alpha- and beta-chains or by the exchange of the human constant region for murine sequences. In this study, we analyzed the functional activity of WT1-TCR variants expressed in Jurkat cells and in primary T cells. The introduction of cysteine residues or murine constant sequences into the WT1-TCR did not result in a global reduction of mispairing with wild-type TCR chains. Instead, the level of mispairing was affected by the variable region sequences of the wild-type TCR chains. The analysis of freshly transduced peripheral blood T cells showed that the transfer of modified TCR constructs generated a higher frequency of Ag-responsive T cells than the transfer of the wild-type TCR. After several rounds of peptide stimulation this difference was. no longer observed, as all transduced T cell populations accumulated similar to 90% of Agresponsive T cells. Although the Ag-responsive T cells expressing the modified TCR bound the HLA-A2/WT1 tetramer more efficiently than T cells expressing the wild-type TCR, this did not improve the avidity of transduced T cells nor did it result in a measurable enhancement in IFN-gamma production and cytotoxic activity. This indicated that the enhanced tetramer binding of modified WT1-TCR variants was not associated with improved WT1-specific T cell function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据