4.7 Article

Within-canopy nitrogen and photosynthetic gradients are unaffected by soil fertility in rield-grown Eucalyptus globulus

期刊

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 1607-1617

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/27.11.1607

关键词

chlorophyll; maximurn photosynthetic rate; phosphorus; photosynthetic biochemistry; relative irradiance; rubisco; stoinatal conductance

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A significant and well-supported hypothesis is that increased growth following nitrogen (N) fertilization is a function of the relationships among photosynthesis, tissue N content and the light environment-specifically, the within canopy allocation of N among leaves and the within-leaf allocation of N between Rubisco and chlorophyll. We tested this hypothesis in a field trial that included annual applications of N,P,K fertilizer (from planting) to a Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantation growing on uniform leached sands. Growth of 4-year-old E. globulus increased significantly in response to fertilization. Leaf N and phosphorus concentrations were 0.1-0.5 gm(-2) and 0.4-0.5 gm(-2) higher in fertilized trees compared to unfertilized trees, respectively. Stomatal conductance (g(s)) at the maximum photosynthetic rate (A(max)) was between 0.2 and 0.4 mol m(-2) s(-1) higher in fertilized trees, but A(max) and the concentration of Rubisco (Rub(a)) were unaffected by fertilization. This seeming paradox, where there was no response of A(max) to fertilization despite increases in g(s) and leaf N concentration, was explained by reduced in vivo specific activity of Rubisco in fertilized trees. Acclimation to light, measured by redistribution of N between Rubisco and chlorophyll, was unaffected by fertilization. Distribution of leaf N followed irradiance gradients, but A(max) did not. Maximum photosynthetic rate was correlated with leaf N concentration only in unfertilized trees. These findings indicate that the relationships among photosynthesis, N and the light environment in E. globulus are affected by N,P,K fertilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据