4.7 Article

Repair capacity for UV light-induced DNA damage associated with risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer and tumor progression

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 21, 页码 6532-6539

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0969

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 68233, CA 100264, CA 16672] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES 11740] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To examine the role of suboptimal DNA repair capacity (DRC) for UV light - induced DNA damage in the development of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and tumor progression. Experimental Design: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study of 255 patients with newly diagnosed NMSC [146 with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and 109 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)] and 333 cancer-free controls. We collected information on demographic variables and risk factors from questionnaires, tumor characteristics from medical records, and lymphocytic DRC phenotype by the host-cell reactivation assay. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl). Results: Overall, there was a relative 16% reduction in DRC in NMSC patients compared with controls (P < 0.001 for BCC and for CC, respectively). DRC below the controls' median value was associated with increased risk significantly for BCC (OR, 1.62; 95% Cl, 1.07-2.45) but borderline for SCC (OR, 1.63; 95% Cl, 0.95-2.79) after adjustment for age, sex, and other assay-related covariates. When the highest tertile of controls' DRC was used as the reference, the intermediate and low DRC were associated with a statistically significant trend for increasing risk for both BCC (P-trend = 0.007) and SCC (P-trend = 0.020). However, patients with aggressive or multiple SCC tended to have a higher DRC than those with nonaggressive or single SCC. Conclusions: Reduced DRC is an independent risk factor for BCC and single or nonaggressive SCC but not for multiple primaries, local aggressiveness, or recurrence of NMSC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据