4.7 Article

Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting-curve analysis of the SNRPN gene as a diagnostic screen for Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 11, 页码 1960-1962

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.093351

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Angelman syndrome (AS) and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) are 2 distinct neurodevelopmental disorders caused primarily by deficiency of specific parental contributions at an imprinted domain within the chromosomal region 15q11.2-13. Lack of paternal contribution results in PWS either by paternal deletion (approximately 70%) or maternal uniparental disomy. (UPD) (approximately 25%). Most cases of AS result from the lack of a maternal contribution from this same region, by maternal deletion (70%) or paternal UPD (approximately 5%). Analysis of allelic methylation differences at the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N (SNRPN) locus differentiates the maternally and paternally inherited chromosome 15 and can be used as a diagnostic test for AS and PWS. Methods: Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting-curve analysis (MS-HRM) using the DNA binding dye EvaGreen was used to analyze methylation differences at the SNRPN locus in anonymized DNA samples from individuals with PWS (n = 39) or AS (n = 31) and from healthy control individuals (n = 95). Results from the MS-HRM assay were compared to those obtained by use of a methylation-specific PCR (MSP) protocol that is used commonly in diagnostic practice. Results: With the MS-HRM assay 97.6% of samples were unambiguously assigned to the 3 diagnostic categories (AS, PWS, normal) by use of automated calling with an 80% confidence percentage threshold, and the failure rate was 0.6%. One PWS sample showed a discordant result for the MS-HRM assay compared to MSP data. Conclusions: MS-HRM is a simple, rapid, and robust method for screening methylation differences at the SNRPN locus and could be used as a diagnostic screen for PWS and AS. (C) 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据