4.4 Article

Oropharyngeal aspiration and pneumonia in children

期刊

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 1024-1031

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.20687

关键词

aspiration; oropharyngeal aspiration; dysphagia; modified barium swallow; pneumonia; videofluoroscopy; videofluoroscopic swallow study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA) of food and fluids is known to be associated with pneumonia in dysphagic children with neurological disease and direct causality is often assumed. However, little is known about the relationship between OPA and pneumonia in medically complex children when other possible risk factors for pneumonia are considered. We examined the association of World Health Organization (WHO)-defined pneumonia in a heterogeneous group of children with swallowing dysfunction identified by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS). A retrospective chart review of 150 children (aged 2 weeks to 20 years) was undertaken to determine the relationship between pneumonia and (i) type of swallowing dysfunction (including OPA), (ii) consistency of aspirated food/fluid, and (iii) other factors including multisystem involvement and age (<= 1 year or >1 year). In univariate analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for pneumonia was significantly increased in children with post-swallow residue (PSR) (OR 2.5) or aspiration on thin fluids (OR 2.4), but not with aspiration of thick fluids or purees. In multi-logistic regression, type of swallowing dysfunction or aspirated food/fluid were no longer significant. Instead, pneumonia was significantly associated with diagnosis of asthma (OR 13.25), Down syndrome (OR 22.10), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (OR 4.28), or history of LRTI (OR 8.28), moist cough (OR 9.17) or oxygen supplementation (OR 6.19). Children with multisystem involvement demonstrated a higher association with pneumonia, but no difference was found for age. We conclude that the impact of OPA on development of pneumonia is considerably reduced once other factors in children with multisystem involvement Eire taken into account.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据