4.5 Article

Losartan improves the impaired function of endothelial progenitor cells in hypertension via an antioxidant effect

期刊

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 1119-1128

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1291/hypres.30.1119

关键词

angiotensin II receptor antagonist; endothelial progenitor cell; oxidative stress; hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the effects of the angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor blocker (ARB) losartan on the formation and number of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in hypertensive rats. Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and stroke-prone, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR-SP) were salt-loaded and then treated with losartan (10 mg/ kg/day), trichlormethiazide (TCM; 1.6 mg/kg/day), or tempol (1 mmol/L) for 2 weeks. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated, subjected to flow cytometric analysis to determine the number of circulating EPCs, cultured to assay EPC colony formation, and subjected to a migration chamber assay to evaluate EPC migration. Oxidative stress in EPCs was evaluated by thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) assay. The results showed that the number, colony formation, and migration of EPCs were markedly decreased in SHR-SP compared to those in WKY rats. The TBARS scores were significantly greater in SHR-SP than in WKY rats. Losartan and TCM decreased systolic blood pressure in SHR-SP to similar levels. Losartan and tempol increased the number of circulating EPCs and colony formation, and inhibited oxidation in SHR-SP. TCM did not affect the EPC number, colony formation, or oxidation. Both losartan and TCM stimulated EPC migration. Expression of gp91(phox), p22(phox), and p47(phox) mRNA in tissues was significantly decreased by losartan but not by TCM. These results indicate that the formation and function of EPCs are impaired by oxidative stress in SHR-SP. This is the first report to show that losartan improves the proliferation and function of EPCs in hypertension, suggesting that ARBs are useful to repair hypertensive vascular injuries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据