4.6 Article

Persistent low-frequency spontaneous discharge in a-fiber and c-fiber primary afferent neurons during an inflammatory pain condition

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 107, 期 5, 页码 813-821

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.anes.0000286983.33184.9c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Primary afferent nociceptor sensitization and its accompanying spontaneous discharge are believed to be the proximate cause of the spontaneous pain and hypersensitivity that follow an acute tissue injury. Evidence for this comes almost entirely from studies limited to the first few minutes to an hour or two after injury, when the inflammatory reaction to injury has just begun. However, there is evidence that inflammatory pain mechanisms differ from acute pain mechanisms and that the mechanisms that drive and modulate inflammatory pain may evolve over time. Methods: The authors surveyed spontaneous afferent discharge in rats with hind paw inflammation evoked by complete Freund adjuvant over the entire 14 days of the inflammatory pain condition, as determined in parallel experiments assessing allodynia and hyperalgesia. Results: Inflammation-evoked heat hyperalgesia, mechano-allodynia, and mechanohyperalgesia began within hours, persisted until at least day 7, and resolved by day 14. A large percentage (23%) of A fibers had spontaneous discharge 2 days after inflammation, but the incidence was much reduced (to 7-9%) by 7 and 14 days. At all times, the A-fiber discharge frequency was low (< 3.0 Hz) or very low (< 0.3 Hz). A large percentage (24%) of C fibers had spontaneous discharge 2 and 7 days after inflammation, but this also declined to near control levels by day 14; C-fiber discharge frequency was also always low (most at 0.3-1.0 Hz). Conclusions: The pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia associated with an established inflammatory condition are associated with a persistent low-frequency spontaneous discharge in both A-fiber and C-fiber sensory afferents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据