4.0 Article

Distinct Taconic, Salinic, and Acadian deformation along the iapetus suture zone, Newfoundland Appalachians

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 1567-1585

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/E07-037

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structural mapping in central Newfoundland has identified seven distinct phases of deformation (D-1 to D-7), the most significant of which are D-1, D-2, and D-4. D-1 involved the formation of a Middle and Late Ordovician south-southeast-directed thrust belt and concomitant development of mylonite and phyllonite. A Late Ordovician to Early Silurian D-2 thrust and fold belt overprints D-1 mylonitic deformation and is the most distinctive deformation event in the study area. Late Silurian to Devonian D-4 is responsible for folds and north-northwest-directed dextral thrust and reverse faults that overprint D-1 to D-3 structures. D-4 structures in central Newfoundland include the Exploits-Gander boundary. Subsequent deformation is generally of local significance only. The are-back-arc complexes making up the various terranes in central Newfoundland are predominantly juxtaposed along D-1 shear zones, which include the Red Indian Line. Our data indicate that terrane boundaries initiated during D-1 may have protracted deformation histories spanning several deformation events. This has important implications for the interpretation of terrane boundaries in Newfoundland, as D-1 terrane boundaries may be interpreted as D-2 or D-4 shear zones depending on the intensity of overprinting or reactivation. The deformation history proposed in this paper corresponds closely to that of established Appalachian orogenic cycles. D-1 is correlated with the Ordovician Taconic orogeny and involved accretion of arc-back-arc complexes to the Laurentian margin. D-2 and D-4 are correlated with the Ordovician-Silurian Salinic and Silurian-Devonian Acadian orogenies, which involved the subsequent accretion of the Ganderia and Avalonia microcontinents to the Laurentian margin, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据