4.1 Article

Human round spermatids from azoospermic men exhibit oocyte-activation and Ca2+ oscillation-inducing activities

期刊

ZYGOTE
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 337-346

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0967199407004339

关键词

calcium oscillation; human; non-obstructive azoospermia; oocyte activation; round spermatid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During mammalian fertilization, intracellular Ca2+ oscillations are important for both oocyte activation and embryonic development. As the ability of round spermatids (ROS) to induce Ca2+ oscillations and oocyte activation is different between species, we examined Ca2+ oscillation- and oocyte activation-inducing abilities of human ROS originating from patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Human ROS from 11 non-obstructive azoospermic patients were collected during their TESE-ICSI cycles. Following injection into mature unfertilized mouse oocytes, we examined the oocyte-activating and Ca2+ oscillation-inducing activities of ROS by using Ca2+ imaging and confocal laser scanning microscopy (mouse test). In these 11 cases, clinical TESE-ICSI using mature testicular spermatozoa was successful, with the exception of one case in which only one sperm-injected oocyte was not fertilized. The mean fertilization rate was 70.1% (40-100%); the mean cleavage rate was 97.9% (46/47). Two pregnancies were established from 10 transfer cycles (PR; 20%). When the ROS from these patients were injected into mouse oocytes, the ROS from all patients induced at least some intracellular Ca2+ oscillations (25-100%). In all patients, 40 out of 82 oocytes injected with ROS exhibited normal oscillation patterns of [Ca2+]i. Human spermatogenetic cells acquired oocyte-activating and Ca2+ oscillation-inducing abilities at the round spermatid stage, an earlier stage than found for rodent cells. These data indicate that human ROS might be useful for clinical treatments of non-obstructive azoospermic patients exhibiting mature spermatozoa in biopsied specimens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据