4.7 Article

Identifying correlates of suicide attempts in suicidal ideators:: a population-based study

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 11, 页码 1551-1562

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291707000803

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Identification of factors that distinguish between ideators who act on their suicidal thoughts from those who do not is an important clinical and research objective. Method. We examined correlates of suicide attempts in suicidal ideators, members of a French-Canadian, school-based cohort. Suicidal thoughts were evaluated in adolescence and early adulthood in the total sample of suicidal ideators, who were then stratified into subgroups consisting of persistent ideators, male ideators and female ideators. Results. In addition to persistent suicidal ideas [odds ratios (ORs) 2.1-2.8], Axis I psychopathology, female gender and childhood sexual abuse (CSA) were the most consistent correlates of suicide attempts. Externalizing disorders were significant contributors in persistent ideators [drug misuse: OR 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.9] and in male ideators in particular (disruptive disorders: OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.2-16.0). In women, psychiatric co-morbidity also had a significant effect (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). CSA was of relevance in both women (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4) and persistent ideators (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5). Personality traits showed gender-specific contribution with affective instability (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.1) and anxiousness (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.7) contributing in men and disruptive aggression (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.03-1.3) in women. Conclusions. Correlates of suicide attempts in suicidal ideators vary as a function of the persistence of suicidal ideas and gender. This heterogeneity across subgroups of suicidal ideators may be attributed, at least in part, to differences between the sexes, early environmental adversity, maladaptive personality, and psychiatric symptoms. Further exploration and continued prospective follow-up is necessary to examine these possibilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据