4.4 Article

Naris occlusion alters the electro-olfactogram: Evidence for compensatory plasticity in the olfactory system

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 427, 期 2, 页码 112-116

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.09.013

关键词

odor; deprivation; olfactory; EOG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unilateral naris occlusion (NO) has been widely used as a method of olfactory deprivation to study the role of stimulus-driven activity in olfactory development [P.C. Brunjes, Unilateral naris closure and olfactory system development, Brain Res. Rev. 19 (1994) 146-160]. Recent immunochemical studies of the olfactory epithelium (OE) following NO provide evidence for a previously unknown compensatory response to deprivation [D.M. Coppola, A. Waguespack, M. Reems, M.L. Butman, J. Cherry, Naris occlusion alters transductory protein immunoreactivity in olfactory epithelium, Histol. Histopathol. 21 (2006) 487-501; A. Waguespack, M. Reems, M.L. Butman, J. Cherry, D.M. Coppola, Olfactory receptor neurons have enhanced olfactory marker protein immunoreactivity in the nasal cavity ipsilateral to naris occlusion, Brain Res. 1044 (2005) 1-7]. To further investigate this phenomenon we measured electro-olfactograms (EOG) from the open and occluded OE of adult mice that had undergone NO as newborns. EOG waveforms from the open side OE of NO mice were indistinguishable from those obtained from untreated animals. However, amplitudes of EOGs from the occluded OE of NO mice were greater, on average, than those recorded at matched locations from the open side. This result was consistent across turbinates, odors, and all but the highest odor concentration. In addition, EOGs recorded from the occluded OE had significantly slower onset and recovery kinetics. Responses in a double-pulse protocol confirmed that the kinetics of the cellular or population processes that underlie the EOG are slowed by NO. These results provide the most direct support, to date, for compensatory plasticity in the olfactory system. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据