4.7 Article

Integral field spectroscopy of high-redshift star-forming galaxies with laser-guided adaptive optics: Evidence for dispersion-dominated kinematics

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 669, 期 2, 页码 929-946

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/521786

关键词

galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; galaxies : starburst

资金

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E00105X/1, ST/F001967/1, PP/E001068/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [PP/E001068/1, ST/F001967/1, PP/E00105X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present early results from an ongoing study of the kinematic structure of star-forming galaxies at redshift z similar to 2-3 using integral-field spectroscopy of rest-frame optical nebular emission lines in combination with Keck laser guide star adaptive optics (LGSAO). We show kinematic maps of three target galaxies Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF 2237a-C2 located at redshifts z = 2.1820, 2.0067, and 3.3172, respectively, each of which is well resolved with a PSF measuring approximately 0.11-0.15 (similar to 900-1200 pc at z similar to 2-3) after cosmetic smoothing. Neither galaxy at z similar to 2 exhibits substantial kinematic structure on scales greater than or similar to 30 km s(-1); both are instead consistent with largely dispersion-dominated velocity fields with sigma similar to 80 km s(-1) along any given line of sight into the galaxy. In contrast, DSF 2237a-C2 presents a well-resolved gradient in velocity over a distance of similar to 4 kpc with peak-to-peak amplitude of 140 km s(-1). It is unlikely that DSF 2237a-C2 represents a dynamically cold rotating disk of ionized gas as the local velocity dispersion of the galaxy (sigma = 79 km s(-1))is comparable to the observed shear. While some gas cooling models reproduce the observed kinematics better than a simple rotating disk model, even these provide a poor overall description of the target galaxies, suggesting that our current understanding of gas cooling mechanisms in galaxies in the early universe is (at best) incomplete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据