4.5 Article

Assessment of climatic and orographic conditions on the infection by Calicophoron daubneyi and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in grazing beef cattle (NW Spain)

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 149, 期 3-4, 页码 285-289

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.08.002

关键词

Calicophoron daubneyi; Dicrocoelium dendriticum; trematodosis; rubia gallega cattle; semi-extensive breeding system; NW Spain; climatic and orographic factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From February 2003 to March 2004, 1148 faecal samples from autochthonous Rubia Gallega cattle breed were collected in 170 farms from Lugo (NW Spain), in order to find out the prevalence and intensity of egg-excretion by Calicophoron daubneyi and Dicrocoelium dendriticum, and the possible influence of external factors as annual mean temperature and rainfall, altitude and mean slope. Twenty-six percent (95% CI 19%, 33%) and the 18% (12, 24) of the farms were infected with rumen and lancet flukes. C. daubneyi egg-output (Me = 24) was found in 13% (11, 15) of the individual samples. Six percent (5, 7) of the animals in the study had low D. dendriticum eggs (Me = 8). By estimating the odds ratio values it was shown that the highest probability of infection by C. daubneyi was in pastures with a mean slope of less than 13% (OR = 1.9) and situated under 600 m (OR = 1.6). Annual mean rainfall and temperature were not identified as risk factors for the infection with rumen flukes. Mountainous pastures with a mean slope of higher than 25% (OR = 5.8) and situated over 600 m (OR = 24.6) where precipitation was high (> 1000 mm; OR = 7) and temperature low (< 11 degrees C; 2.8) had involved the highest risk of infection by D. dendriticuin. Because of the prevalences found in this study, employment of suitable management practices with strategic treatments with efficacious anthelmintics are needed to reduce the presence of both trematodes and to increase the health status of grazing beef cattle. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据