4.4 Article

The homeodomain transcription factor Prep1 (pKnox1) is required for hematopoletic stem and progenitor cell activity

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 311, 期 2, 页码 324-334

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.031

关键词

homeobox; prepl; hematopoiesis; hernatopmetic stem cells; repopulating activity

资金

  1. Telethon [TGT06S01, GGP02031] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of the hypomorphic Prepl(i/i) embryos (expressing 3-10% of the Prepl protein), die between E17.5 and P0, with profound anemia, eye malformations and angiogenic anomalies [Ferretti, E., Villaescusa, J.C., Di Rosa, P., Fernandez-Diaz, L.-C., Longobardi, E., Mazzieri, R., Miccio, A., Micali, N., Selleri, L., Ferrari G., Blasi, F. (2006). Hypomorphic mutation of the TALE gene Prep] (pKnoxl) causes a major reduction of Pbx and Meis proteins and a pleiotropic embryonic phenotype. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 5650-5662]. We now report on the hematopoietic phenotype of these embryos. Prepl(i/i) fetal livers (FL) are hypoplastic, produce less common myeloid progenitors colonies (CFU-GEMM) in cytokinesupplemented methylcellulose and have an increased number of B-cells precursors that differentiate poorly. Prep](i/i) FL is able to protect lethally irradiated mice only at high cell doses but the few protected mice show major anomalies in all hematopoietic lineages in both bone marrow (BM) and peripheral organs. Prepl(i/i) FL cells compete inefficiently with wild type bone marrow in competitive repopulation experiments, suggesting that the major defect lies in long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells (LTR-HSC). Indeed, wt embryonic expression of Prep] in the aortagonad-mesonephros (AGM) region, fetal liver (FL), cKit(+)Scal(+)Lin(-)AA4.1(+) (KSLA) cells and B-lymphocytes precursors agrees with the observed phenotype. We therefore conclude that Prep I is required for a correct and complete hematopoiesis. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据