4.4 Article

Cell adhesion molecule Echinoid associates with unconventional myosin VI/Jaguar motor to regulate cell morphology during dorsal closure in Drosophila

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 311, 期 2, 页码 423-433

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.043

关键词

echinoid; jaguar; myosin VI; cell adhesion; cell migration; dorsal closure; Drosophila

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Echinoid (Ed) is a homophilic immunoglobulin domain-containing cell adhesion molecule (CAM) that localizes to adherens junctions (AJs) and cooperates with Drosophila melanogaster epithelial (DE)-cadherin to mediate cell adhesion. Here we show that Ed takes part in many processes of dorsal closure, a morphogenetic movement driven by coordinated cell shape changes and migration of epidermal cells to cover the underlying amnioserosa. Ed is differentially expressed, appearing in epidermis but not in amnioserosa cells. Ed functions independently from the JNK signaling pathway and is required to regulate cell morphology, and for assembly of actomyosin cable, filopodial protrusion and coordinated cell migration in dorsal-most epidermal cells. The effect of Ed on cell morphology requires the presence of the intracellular domain (Ed(intra)). Interestingly, Ed forms homodimers in vivo and Ed(intra) monomer directly associates with unconventional myosin VI/Jaguar (Jar) motor protein. We further show that ed genetically interacts with jar to control cell morphology. It has previously been shown that myosin VI is monomeric in vitro and that its dimeric form can associate with and travel processively along actin filaments. Thus, we propose that Ed mediates the dimerization of myosin VI/Jar in vivo which in turn regulates the reorganization and/or contraction of actin filaments to control changes in cell shape. Consistent with this, we found that ectopic ed expression in the amnioserosa induces myosin VI/Jar-dependent apical constriction of this tissue. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据