4.7 Article

Selective inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibition has no effect on allergen challenge in asthma

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200704-588OC

关键词

nitric oxide; bronchial hyperreactivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale Exhaled breath nitric oxide (F-ENO) is increased in asthma. NO is produced predominantly by inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Objectives: We evaluated the selective and potent NOS inhibitor GW274150 in asthma. Methods: Twenty-eight steroid-naive patients with asthma participated in a double-blind, randomized, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-period cross-over study. Subjects received GW274150 (90 mg), montelukast (10 mg), or placebo once daily for 14 days. FENO was assessed predose on Days 1, 7, 10, and 14. Adenosine 5 '-monophosphate (AMP) challenge was performed on Day 10, allergen challenge on Day 14 followed by methacholine challenge (MCh) 24 hours later, and then bronchoscopy. Measurements and Main Results: GW274150 reduced predose FENO by 73, 75, and 71% on Days 7, 10, and 14, respectively, compared with placebo. Montelukast did not reduce FENO. GW274150 did not inhibit AMP reactivity whereas for montelukast there was a trend toward inhibition: the mean doubling dose difference versus placebo was 0.64 (95% confidence interval [95% Cl], 0 to 1.28). GW274150 did not inhibit early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses to allergen, or MCh reactivity, despite reduced FEND levels. Montelukast inhibited EAR and LAIR FEV1; the mean difference versus placebo for minimal FEV1 was 0.37 L (95% Cl, 0.19 to 0.55) and 0.18 L (95% Cl, 0.04 to 0.32), respectively. MCh reactivity was inhibited by montelukast (mean doubling dose difference vs. placebo, 0.51; 95% Cl, 0.02 to 1.01). GW271540 also had no effect on inflammatory cell numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after allergen challenge. Conclusions: Selective iNOS inhibition effectively reduces FENO but does not affect airway hyperreactivity or airway inflammatory cell numbers after allergen challenge in subjects with asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据