4.5 Article

Surgical rates and operative outcome analysis in thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult scoliosis - Application of the new adult deformity classification

期刊

SPINE
卷 32, 期 24, 页码 2723-2730

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a58f2

关键词

adult deformity; classification; outcomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Design. Multicenter prospective consecutive clinical series. Objective. Investigate the interaction between the Adult Deformity Classification and treatment patterns, surgical strategies, surgery effectiveness, and complication rates. Summary of Background Data. An Adult Deformity Classification has been established that applies radiographic parameters of disability. Preliminary intraobserver and interobserver analysis reveals excellent reliability of the classification. Outcomes studies have not been reported to date. Methods. A total of 784 adult patients with thoracolumbar or lumbar deformity underwent radiographic evaluation ( full-length frontal/sagittal) as well as health assessment: Oswestry Disability Index, Scoliosis Research Society-22, and SF-12. Patients were subdivided by treatment and surgical strategies; 1 year ( 111 patients) and 2 year ( 45 patients) follow-up data were analyzed. Interaction between classification, treatment, surgical strategy, health assessment changes, and complications were analyzed. Results. Classification modifiers ( lordosis, subluxation, sagittal balance) were found to have significant variation ( higher rates) in surgical care as the grade of the modifier increased. Classification differentiated patients by surgical approach and/or technique. Interaction between classification and baseline health assessment impacts both postoperative health scores and complication rates. Conclusion. This investigation appears to offer the first comprehensive analysis of classification, treatment, and outcomes in a large adult deformity patient group. Significant treatment patterns and outcomes are coming to light as is the impact of surgical strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据