4.7 Article

A new sample of low-mass black holes in active galaxies

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 670, 期 1, 页码 92-104

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/522082

关键词

galaxies : active; galaxies : nuclei; galaxies : Seyfert

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an expanded sample of low- mass black holes ( BHs) found in galactic nuclei. Using standard virial mass techniques to estimate BH masses, we select from the Fourth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey all broadline active galaxies with masses < 2 x 10(6) M circle dot. BHs in this mass regime provide unique tests of the relationship between BHs and galaxies, since their late- type galaxy hosts do not necessarily contain classical bulges. Furthermore, they provide observational analogs of primordial seed BHs and are expected, when merging, to provide strong gravitational signals for future detectors such as LISA. From our preliminary sample of 19, we have increased the total sample by an order of magnitude to 174, as well as an additional 55 ( less secure) candidates. The sample has a median BH mass of < M-BH > = 1.3 x 10(6) M circle dot, and in general the objects are radiating at high fractions of their Eddington limits. We investigate the broad spectral properties of the sample; 55 are detected by ROSAT, with soft X-ray luminosities in the range 10(40) to 7 x 10(43) ergs s(-1). Much like the preliminary sample, these objects are predominantly radio-quiet ( R equivalent to f(6cm)/f(4400)angstrom < 10), but 11 objects are detected at 20 cm, with radio powers ( 10(21) - 10(23) WHz(-1)) that may arise from either star formation or nuclear activity; only 1% of the sample is radio-loud. We further confirm that, with < Mg > = - 19: 3 and < g - r > = 0.7 mag, the host galaxies are low- mass, late- type systems. At least 40% show disklike morphologies, and the combination of host galaxy colors and higher order Balmer absorption lines indicate intermediateage stellar populations in a subset of the sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据