4.6 Article

Atypical antipsychotics attenuate a sub-chronic PCP-induced cognitive deficit in the novel object recognition task in the rat

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 184, 期 1, 页码 31-38

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.06.012

关键词

schizophrenia; phencyclidine; novel object recognition; Antipsychotics; cognition; rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel object recognition (NOR) task is a paradigm employed to detect both disruption and improvement of non-spatial memory in rats. PCP (phencyclidine) may be used to model aspects of schizophrenia symptomology in rats, in particular cognitive deficits. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of typical and atypical antipsychotics to improve a sub-chronic PCP-induced impairment in cognition using the NOR task. Female hooded-Lister rats (195 +/- 12 g) received either vehicle (0.9% saline twice daily) or PCP (2 mg/kg, twice daily) for 7 days followed by 7-days drug free. Haloperidol (0.05 and 0.075 mg/kg), clozapine (1 and 5 mg/kg), risperidone (0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) or vehicle (veh, saline) was administered i.p. 30 min prior to testing. Rats completed an acquisition trial followed by an inter-trial interval of I min, then a retention trial. Following sub-chronic vehicle treatment, rats spent significantly (p < 0.05) more time exploring the novel compared to the familiar object, an effect that was abolished in the sub-chronic PCP treated animals. Clozapine (1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg) and risperidone (0.2 mg/kg) but not haloperidol significantly attenuated the PCP-induced impairment such that animals again spent significantly more time exploring the novel compared with familiar object (p < 0.05). These results support our earlier work showing that acute PCP induces a robust object recognition deficit in female rats. Clozapine and risperidone but not haloperidol showed efficacy to reverse the deficit induced by sub-chronic PCP suggesting that this test may have some validity for assessing efficacy for improvement of cognitive deficit symptoms of schizophrenia. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据