4.7 Article

Notch signaling contributes to the expression of cardiac markers in human circulating progenitor cells

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 101, 期 11, 页码 1139-1145

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.151381

关键词

Notch; EPC; cardiac differentiation; Wnt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been demonstrated that adult human circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) can differentiate to a cardiomyogenic phenotype. Notch signaling promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation and plays a role in heart and vessel development. Here, we investigated the role of Notch activation for cardiac differentiation of EPCs in a coculture system with neonatal cardiomyocyte. After coculture, Notch activation was transiently detected in EPCs, as determined by immunhistochemical detection of NICD (the intracellular cleavage fragment of Notch-1) and expression of human Notch target genes. Inhibition of gamma-secretase blocked Notch cleavage and NICD translocation. Furthermore, the expression of the cardiac marker protein alpha-sarcomeric actinin and troponin T was significantly suppressed by gamma-secretase inhibition or addition of soluble recombinant Jagged-1, indicating that Notch activation facilitates cardiac marker gene expression. Because noncanonical Wnts have previously been shown to promote cardiac differentiation, we additionally determined the influence of Notch activation on the expression of Wnt5a and Wnt11. Wnt5a and Wnt11 expression in the human cells was induced by the coculture and was blocked by gamma-secretase inhibition. Likewise, stimulation of Notch signaling by immobilized Jagged-1 promoted Wnt5a expression in EPCs. These data suggest that Notch is activated upon coculture of EPCs with neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. gamma-Secretase-dependent Notch activation is required for cardiac gene expression in human cells and induces the expression of noncanonical Wnt proteins, which may act in a paracrine manner to further amplify cardiac differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据