4.7 Article

Top production at the Tevatron/LHC and nonstandard, strongly interacting spin one particles

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 657, 期 1-3, 页码 69-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.057

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this Letter, we consider possible constraints from t (t) over bar production on the gauge bosons of theories with an extended strong interaction sector such as axigluons or flavour universal colorons. Such constraints are found to be competitive with those obtained from the dijet data. The current t (t) over bar data from the Tevatron rule out axigluon masses (m(A)) up to 910 GeV and 920 GeV at 95% and 90% confidence levels, respectively. For the case of the flavour universal colorons, for cot xi = 1, where xi is the mixing angle, the mass ranges m(C) less than or similar to 800 GeV and 895 less than or similar to m(C) less than or similar to 1960 GeV are excluded at 95% confidence level (C.L.), whereas the same at 90% C.L. are m(C) less than or similar to 805 GeV and 880 less than or similar to m(C) less than or similar to 2470 GeV. For cot xi = 2 on the other hand, the excluded range is m(C) less than or similar to 955(960) GeV and 1030 less than or similar to m(C) less than or similar to 3250 (1020 less than or similar to m(C) less than or similar to 3250) GeV at 95% (90%) C.L., respectively. We point out that for higher axigluon/coloron masses, even for the dijet channel, the limits on the coloron mass, for cot = 1, may be different than those for the axigluon. We also compute the expected forward-backward asymmetry for the case of the axigluons which would allow it to be discriminated against the SM as also the colorons. We further find that at the LHC, the signal should be visible in the t (t) over bar invariant mass spectrum for a wide range of axigluon and coloron masses that are still allowed. We point out how top polarisation may be used to further discriminate the axigluon and coloron case from the SM as well as from each other. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据