4.6 Article

Entry of hepatitis delta virus requires the conserved cysteine residues of the hepatitis B virus envelope protein antigenic loop and is blocked by inhibitors of thiol-disulfide exchange

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 81, 期 23, 页码 13057-13066

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01495-07

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) particles are coated with the envelope proteins (large, middle, and small) of the hepatitis B virus (HBV). The large protein bears an infectivity determinant in its pre-S1 domain, whereas a second determinant has been proposed to map to the cysteine-rich antigenic loop (AGL) within the S domain of all three envelope proteins (G. Abou Jaoude and C. Sureau, J. Virol. 79:10460-10466, 2006). In this study, the AGL cysteines were substituted by serine or alanine, and the mutants were evaluated for their function at viral entry using HDV particles and susceptible HepaRG cells. Mutations of cysteines 121 to 149 were tolerant of the production of HDV virions. The mutations altered the structure and antigenicity of the conserved a determinant of the AGL, as measured by conformation-sensitive antibodies, and they created a block to infectivity. Substitution of Cys-90 or Cys-221, located outside of the AGL, had no impact on the a determinant or viral entry. Furthermore, infectivity was maintained when the AGL CxxC motif at position 121 to 124 was modified by single-amino-acid deletion or insertion, suggesting that cysteines 121 and 124 are not catalyzers of thiol/disulfide exchange. However, membrane-impermeable inhibitors of thiol/disulfide isomerazation demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibition of infection in an in vitro assay when applied to the virus prior to inoculation or during the virus-cell interaction period. Overall, the results demonstrate the essential role of the AGL cysteines at viral entry, and they establish a correlation between the cysteine disulfide network, the conformation of the a determinant, and infectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据