4.1 Article

Evaluation of the effect of computed tomography scan protocols and freeform fabrication methods on bone biomodel accuracy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 72, 期 9, 页码 1178-1185

出版社

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1178

关键词

-

资金

  1. College of Veterinary Medicine Clinical Initiative
  2. North Carolina State University
  3. Biomodeling Laboratory, Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-To assess the effect of computed tomography (CT) scan protocols (radiation amounts) and fabrication methods on biomodel accuracy and variability. Sample-Cadaveric femur of a Basset Hound. Procedures-Retroreconstructions (n = 158) were performed of 16 original scans and were visually inspected to select 17 scans to be used for biomodel fabrication. Biomodels of the 17 scans were made in triplicate by use of 3 freeform fabrication processes (stereolithography, fused deposition modeling, and 3-D printing) for 153 models. The biomodels and original bone were measured by use of a coordinate measurement machine. Results-Differences among fabrication methods accounted for 2% to 29% of the total observed variation in inaccuracy and differences among method-specific radiation configurations accounted for 4% to 44%. Biomodels underestimated bone length and width and femoral head diameter and overestimated cortical thickness. There was no evidence of a linear association between thresholding adjustments and biomodel accuracy. Higher measured radiation dose led to a decrease in absolute relative error for biomodel diameter and for 4 of 8 cortical thickness measurements. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-The outside dimensions of biomodels have a clinically acceptable accuracy. The cortical thickness of biomodels may overestimate cortical thickness. Variability among biomodels was caused by model fabrication reproducibility and, to a lesser extent, by the radiation settings of the CT scan and differences among fabrication methods. (Am J Vet Res 201172:1178-1185)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据