4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Adenosine A2A receptors and brain injury:: Broad spectrum of neuroprotection, multifaceted actions and fine tuning modulation

期刊

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 83, 期 5, 页码 310-331

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.09.002

关键词

adenosine receptor; adenosine A(2A) receptors; purinergic receptors; neuroprotection; stroke ischemia; Parkinson's disease; Huntington's disease; multiple sclerosis; HIV-1-associated dementia; caffeine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes recent developments that have contributed to understand how adenosine receptors, particularly A(2A) receptors, modulate brain injury in various animal models of neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), stroke, Huntington's disease (HD), multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and HIV-associated dementia. It is clear that extracellular adenosine acting at adenosine receptors influences the functional outcome in a broad spectrum of brain injuries, indicating that A(2A)Rs may modulate some general cellular processes to affect neuronal cells death. Pharmacological, neurochemical and molecular/genetic approaches to the complex actions of A(2A) receptors in different cellular elements suggest that A(2A) receptor activation can be detrimental or protective after brain insults, depending on the nature of brain injury and associated pathological conditions. An interesting concept that emerges from these studies is A(2A)R's ability to fine tune neuronal and glial functions to produce neuroprotective effects. While the data presented here clearly highlight the complexity of using adenosinergic agents therapeutically in PD and other neurodegenerative disorders and point out many areas for further inquiry, they also confirm that adenosine receptor ligands, particularly A(2A) receptor ligands, have many promising characteristics that encourage the pursuit of their therapeutic potential. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据