4.5 Article

Plasmodium vivax Infections in Duffy-Negative Individuals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0277

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21AI111108, R01TW010870, R01AI107949]
  2. National Science Foundation [BSC-1339949]
  3. Triangle Center for Evolutionary Medicine (TriCEM)
  4. Duke University
  5. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
  6. North Carolina Central University
  7. FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER [R01TW010870] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [T32AI070114, R01AI107949] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although Plasmodium vivax has been assumed to be absent from sub-Saharan Africa because of the protective mutation conferring the Duffy-negative phenotype, recent evidence has suggested that P. vivax cases are prevalent in these regions. We selected 292 dried blood spots from children who participated in the 2013-2014 Demographic and Health Survey of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), to assess for P. vivax infection. Four P. vivax infections were identified by polymerase chain reaction, each in a geographically different survey cluster. Using these as index cases, we tested the remaining 73 samples from the four clusters. With this approach, 10 confirmed cases, three probable cases, and one possible case of P. vivax were identified. Among the 14 P. vivax cases, nine were coinfected with Plasmodium falciparum. All 14 individuals were confirmed to be Duffy-negative by sequencing for the single point mutation in the GATA motif that represses the expression of the Duffy antigen. This finding is consistent with a growing body of literature that suggests that P. vivax can infect Duffy-negative individuals in Africa. Future molecular and sequencing work is needed to understand the relationship of these isolates with other P. vivax samples from Asia and South America and discover variants linked to P. vivax virulence and erythrocyte invasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据