4.6 Review

The impact of successive infections on the lung microenvironment

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY
卷 122, 期 4, 页码 457-465

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02729.x

关键词

infection history; resolution of inflammation; innate response; coinfection; lung imprinting; respiratory viruses; heterologous immunity

资金

  1. MRC [G0400795] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0400795] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0400795] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of infection history on the immune response is ignored in most models of infectious disease and in preclinical vaccination studies. No one, however, is naive and repeated microbial exposure, in particular during childhood, shapes the immune system to respond more efficiently later in life. Concurrent or sequential infections influence the immune response to secondary unrelated pathogens. The involvement of cross-reactive acquired immunity, in particular T-cell responses, is extensively documented. In this review, we discuss the impact of successive infections on the infected tissue itself, with a particular focus on the innate response of the respiratory tract, including a persistent alteration of (1) epithelial or macrophage expression of Toll-like receptors or adherence molecules used by subsequent bacteria to invade the host, (2) the responsiveness of macrophages and neutrophils and (3) the local cytokine milieu that affects the activation of local antigen-presenting cells and hence adaptive immunity to the next infection. We emphasize that such alterations not only occur during coinfection, but are maintained long after the initial pathogen is cleared. As innate responses are crucial to the fight against local pathogens but are also involved in the maintenance of the homeostasis of mucosal tissues, dysregulation of these responses by repeated infections is likely to have a major impact on the outcome of infectious or allergic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据