4.2 Article

Cryptococcus neoformans laccase catalyses melanin synthesis from both D- and L-DOPA

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 3954-3962

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011049-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL059842-08] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI033774, AI063866, AI033142] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans produces melanin in the presence of various substrates, including the L enantiomer of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA). The enzyme laccase catalyses the formation of melanin by oxidizing L-DOPA, initiating a series of presumably spontaneous reactions that ultimately leads to the polymerization of the pigment in the yeast cell wall. There, melanin protects the cell from a multitude of environmental and host assaults. Thus, the ability of C. neoformans to produce pigments from a variety of available substrates is likely to confer a survival advantage. A number of C. neoformans isolates of different serotypes produced pigments from D-DOPA, the stereoisomer Of L-DOPA. Acid-resistant particles were isolated from pigmented C. neoformans cells grown in the presence Of D-DOPA. Biophysical characterization showed the particles had a stably detectable free-radical signal by EPR, and negative zeta potential, similar to L-DOPA-derived particles. No major differences were found between L- and D-DOPA ghosts in terms of binding to anti-melanin antibodies, or in overall architecture when imaged by electron microscopy. C. neoformans cells utilized L- and D-DOPA at a similar rate. Overall, our results indicate that C. neoformans shows little stereoselectivity for utilizing DOPA in melanin synthesis. The ability of C. neoformans to use both L and D enantiomers; for melanization implies that this organism has access to a greater potential pool of substrates for melanin synthesis, and this could potentially be exploited in the design of therapeutic inhibitors of laccase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据