4.0 Article

Performance in specific language tasks correlates with regional volume changes in progressive aphasia

期刊

COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 203-211

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e31815e6265

关键词

confrontation naming; repetition; sentence comprehension; language fluency; language; neuroimaging; voxel-based morphometry; aphasia; primary progressive aphasia

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR00079] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P50 AG-03-006, P01 AG019724] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01NS50915] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patterns of language impairment have long been used clinically to localize brain damage in stroke patients. The same approach might be useful in the differential diagnosis of progressive aphasia owing to neurodegenerative disease. Objective: To investigate whether scores on 4 widely used language tasks correlate with regional gray matter loss in 51 patients with progressive language impairment owing to neurodegenerative disease. Method: Scores in the Boston Naming Test and in the repetition 11 sequential commands and the language fluency, subtests of the Western Aphasia Battery were correlated with voxel-wise gray matter volumes using voxel-based morphometry. Results: Significant positive correlations were found between each language task and regional brain volumes: (1) naming and the bilateral temporal lobes; (2) sentence repetition and the left posterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus; (3) sentence comprehension and the left dorsal middle and inferior frontal gyri; and (4) fluency of language production and the left ventral middle and inferior frontal gyri. Discussion: Performance on specific language tasks corresponds to regional anatomic damage in aphasia owing to neurodegenerative disorders. These language tests might be useful in the differential diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia variants that have been previously associated with damage to corresponding anatomic regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据