4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Charge state effect on the zwitterion influence on stability of non-covalent interaction of single-stranded DNA with peptides

期刊

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 1613-1622

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jms.1359

关键词

noncovalent complexes; salt bridge interaction; ESI mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Negative ion ESI mass spectrometry was used to study the gas-phase stability and dissociation pathways of peptide-DNA complexes. We show that bradykinin and three modified peptides containing the basic residue arginine or lysine form stable interactions with single-stranded oligonucleotides. ESI-MS/MS, of complexes of (T) under bar ((8) under bar) with PPGFSPFRR resulted in a major dissociation pathway through cleavage of the peptide covalent bond. The stability of the complex is due to electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged phosphate group and the basic side chain of the arginine and lysine residues as demonstrated by Vertes et al. and Woods et al. In fact, the present work establishes the role played by zwitterions on complex stabilisation. The presence of protons in nucleobase and/or amino acid contributes in reinforcing the strength of the salt bridge (SB) interaction. The zwitterionic form of the most basic of amino acid residues, arginine, is assumed to form a strong SB interaction to the negatively charged phosphate groups of DNA. This non-covalent complex is stable enough to withstand disruption of the non-covalent interaction and to first break the covalent bond. Moreover, the dependence of fragmentation patterns upon the complex charge state is explained by the fact that the net number of negative charges modulates the number of zwitterionic sites, which stabilise the complexes. Finally, the weak influence of the nucleobase is assumed by the existence of competition for proton addition between the nucleobase and the R/K side chain leading to a decrease in the stabilisation of the SB interaction. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据