4.4 Article

Neonatal co-infection with Helicobacter species markedly accelerates the development of inflammation-associated colonic neoplasia in IL-10-/-mice

期刊

HELICOBACTER
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 598-604

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00552.x

关键词

inflammation; colorectal neoplasia; TGF-beta; Helicobacter; endoglin (CD105)

资金

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [R21-AT002288, R21-AT002818] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA115480] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL49171] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is hypothesized to represent an aberrant immune response against enteric bacteria that occurs in a genetically susceptible host. Humans and mice with IBD are at markedly increased risk for colonic neoplasia. However, the long lead time required before development of inflammation-associated colon neoplasia in commonly used murine models of IBD slows the development of effective chemopreventative therapies. Materials and methods: Neonatal coinfection with Helicobacter typhlonius and Helicobacter rodentium was used to trigger the onset of IBD in mice deficient in the immunoregulatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10. The severity of colon inflammation and incidence of neoplasia was determined histologically. Results: IL-10(-/-)mice demonstrated early onset, severe colon inflammation following neonatal infection with H. typhlonius and H. rodentium. The incidence of inflammation-associated colon neoplasia was similar to 95% at a mean age of 21 +/- 2 weeks. Mutation of endoglin, an accessory receptor for TGF-beta, did not affect the severity of IBD or the incidence of neoplasia in this model. Conclusions: The rapid onset of severe colon inflammation and multiple neoplastic lesions in the colons of IL-10(-/-) mice neonatally coinfected with H. typhlonius and H. rodentium makes this model well-suited for investigating the mechanisms involved in inflammation-associated colon cancer as well as its chemoprevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据