4.6 Article

Molecular modeling of the prekallikrein structure provides insights into high-molecular-weight kininogen binding and zymogen activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 2461-2466

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02792.x

关键词

apple domain; high-molecular-weight kininogen; molecular model; plasma prekallikrein; zymogen activation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Prekallikrein (PK) plays a central role in the contact system that activates blood coagulation and is involved in the regulation of blood pressure.Objectives: To provide three-dimensional structural data for PK and rationalize the molecular basis of substrate recognition and zymogen activation.Patients/methods: The PK homology model was constructed using the coagulation factor (F) XI crystal structure as a template with the program SWISS-MODEL.Results: The domain organization of the PK apple domains and serine protease is conserved compared to FXI. Surface charge calculations on the PK model revealed that ligand binding to high-molecular-weight kininogen (HK) is predicted to have two key determinants: a pocket within the apple 2 domain and a basic channel formed at the interface of apple domains 1 and 4. A hereditary mutation resulting in PK deficiency (Gly104Arg) and the Lys140 alpha-kallikrein cleavage site both disrupt HK binding and are shown to map to opposite sides of the apple 2 domain pocket. The model also describes the differences in the apple 4 domain that prevents dimer formation in PK vs. FXI. A C-terminal extension in the PK serine protease domain is described as a potential substrate for prolylcarboxypeptidase.Conclusions: The interaction between PK and HK is mediated by two discrete surfaces formed by the PK A1, A2 and A4 domains with charge likely to be a critical component of the binding. A novel mode of PK activation is postulated to involve prolylcarboxypeptidase cleaving at the C-terminus rather than the activation loop.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据