4.6 Article

Cyclic equibiaxial tensile strain induces both anabolic and catabolic responses in articular chondrocytes

期刊

GENE
卷 404, 期 1-2, 页码 101-109

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.09.007

关键词

mechanical stress; chondrocyte; osteoarthfitis; cartilage matrix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanical disturbance is directly implicated in the development of osteoarthritis (OA) but the precise mode for degenerative changes is still largely unknown because of the complexity of the biomechanical and biochemical milieu in the articular joint. To investigate the effects of tensile strain on articular cartilage, cyclic equibiaxial tensile strain (CTS, 0.5 Hz, 10% strain) was applied to monolayer cultures of porcine articular chondrocytes by using a Flexercell strain unit. Overproduction of proinflaimmatory mediators and imbalanced expression of anabolic and catabolic genes were induced. The cellular secretion of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)), as well as the mRNA level of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) were up-regulated in response to mechanical stimuli. Additionally, CTS resulted in an initial peak of anabolic response at 3 h of stretch with respect to the expression of type II collagen and aggrecan. After 12 It of CTS, the expression for these two cartilage-specific matrix proteins fell to control levels. A distinct catabolic response developed after 24 h of stretch with an increase in matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1). Interestingly, a parallel increase in transforming growth factor (TGF) 3 was associated with the anabolic changes while an increase in expression of TGF beta 1, the predominant isoform of the TGF family, appeared at 24 h. The expression at 24 h of MMP-1, an enzyme that degrades interstitial collagens as well as other cartilage matrix proteins and TGF beta 1, may signify a shift towards matrix remodeling and potentially a change in matrix composition as a consequence of continuous CTS. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据