4.6 Article

The outcome with ureteric stents for managing non-urological malignant ureteric obstruction

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 100, 期 6, 页码 1288-1291

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07172.x

关键词

urinary diversion; stents; ureteric obstruction; neoplasms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the clinical outcome using ureteric stents to manage ureteric obstruction in advanced non-urological malignancies. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed the use of ureteric stents (Endo-sof, Cook Urological, Spencer, IN, USA) placed for malignant ureteric obstruction from June 2001 to September 2006. The clinical and radiological variables for predicting the failure of stent insertion, functional stent failure and death were analysed. Results In all, 86 patients with a non-urological malignant ureteric obstruction were treated by ureteric stenting; 13 (15%) had failure of retrograde stent insertion, and of the remaining 73, 12 (16%) had stent failures during the subsequent follow-up. The risk of failure for stent insertion significantly increased with male gender (hazard ratio 6.45, P = 0.028) and the presence of bladder invasion (hazard ratio 27.04, P < 0.001). There was no independent predictor of stent failure in univariate analysis. Of the 86 patients, 54 (63%) died with a mean survival time of 8.6 months after an initial attempt to place a stent, and 41 (48%) died within 1 year. Multivariate analysis showed that low performance status, upper ureteric obstruction and no chemotherapy after stenting were independently associated with a poor prognosis (P = 0.03, 0.004 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusion The method of diversion for a malignant ureteric obstruction should be carefully discussed with male patients or if there is bladder invasion. Patients with a low performance status, upper ureteric obstruction and no scheduled chemotherapy after stenting had a poor survival time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据